Heracles, manipulated by a guilt-ridden Hera after a tragedy she causes, embarks on the legendary Labors but, traumatized, chooses to befriend and heal the monsters instead of slaying them. This mythological reimagining explores cycles of trauma, accountability, and found family, blending irreverent humor with heartfelt themes of healing and redemption.

Reader Review Summary

This novel is a mythological fantasy that reimagines the story of Heracles (Hercules) and Hera, told in alternating points of view between the two characters. The narrative begins with Heracles, a devoted follower of Hera, who is unaware that he is the product of Zeus’s infidelity and the target of Hera’s wrath. After Hera orchestrates a tragedy that leads Heracles to kill his own children in a fit of madness, he and his wife Megara set out to seek revenge and answers. Instead of following the traditional path of violence, Heracles, traumatized by his actions, chooses to befriend and care for the monsters he is sent to defeat during his famous labors, such as the Nemean Lion (named Purrseus) and the Lernaean Hydra. The story explores themes of grief, accountability, found family, and the humanization of both gods and monsters, with a tone that blends irreverent humor, emotional depth, and modern sensibilities. The gods are depicted with contemporary language and attitudes, and the book includes references to queerness and diverse character identities.

Readers appreciated the book’s comedic and heartfelt approach to Greek mythology, particularly the dynamic between Heracles and Hera. Many highlighted the humor, especially Hera’s irreverent and often profane narration, and the way the gods’ pettiness and flaws were depicted in a relatable, modern way. The found family aspect, with Heracles forming bonds with monsters instead of slaying them, resonated with readers and was frequently mentioned as a standout element. The emotional exploration of trauma, grief, and healing was also praised, as was the book’s ability to balance dark subject matter with moments of levity. Several readers noted the strong characterization, especially of Hera, and the inclusion of diverse and queer characters. The book’s ability to humanize both gods and monsters, and to reinterpret the labors of Heracles as acts of compassion rather than violence, was seen as a refreshing take on the myth.

Some readers found issues with the book’s pacing, particularly in the middle section where the structure of the twelve labors became repetitive and predictable. The alternating points of view between Hera and Heracles sometimes led to overlapping scenes and a sense of disjointedness. The frequent use of certain phrases, especially Hera’s repeated reference to Zeus as her “dipshit husband,” was cited as excessive and distracting by multiple reviewers. A few readers felt that the humor and modern language clashed with the tragic elements of the story, making the tone feel inconsistent. Others were disappointed by the writing style, describing it as too straightforward or forced, and some did not connect with the comedic approach or the characterization of Hera. There were also a few readers who did not finish the book, citing lack of engagement or dissatisfaction with the execution.

In addition to the main narrative, readers noted the book’s inclusion of meta-commentary on how myths are transformed over time, and its focus on themes such as accountability, forgiveness, and the breaking of cycles of family trauma. The story features a diverse cast, including characters who use they/them pronouns and a mlm romance subplot. The book is described as accessible to those unfamiliar with Greek mythology, while also containing Easter eggs and references for those who are well-versed in the myths. The tone is generally light and cozy despite the presence of dark themes, and the book is recommended for readers interested in found family, mythological retellings, and stories that blend humor with emotional depth.